Observations were undertaken at the NOT on the nights of 2001 July
25--26 using a CCD65 detector. On the first night of observing the
camera showed very poor charge transfer efficiency. On the second
night the CCD was heated electrically inside the liquid nitrogen dewar
and the charge transfer efficiency appeared to improve. The results
presented in this thesis are restricted to data taken on the second
night of observing. Table 5.2 lists the targets
observed on the second night. Some runs where the target saturated the
detector or drifted out of the field have been excluded. All the runs
on this night were taken through the HiRac I-band filter with the
bandpass shown in Figure 5.5. Some of the short
exposure images were affected by one or more white spots which may
have resulted from trace amounts of radioactive material in the
instrument hardware.
Table 5.2:
Observations on 2001 July 6. Some runs where the
detector was saturated or the target drifted out of the field
have been excluded. For some of the targets several runs were
taken with different image sizes. All the observations were
taken using the HiRac I filter centred at
. The
bandpass of this filter is plotted in Figure 5.5.
| Target | Object type | Number of exposures | Image size
(pixels) |
|---|
| CCDM J17339+1747 | Binary star | 14000 | 256 x 256 and
160 x 160 | |
HD161796 | Planetary nebula progenitor | 18000 | 160 x 160 | |
NGC 6543 | Planetary nebula progenitor | 2000 | 512 x 64 | |
aM13 field 1 | Globular cluster | 3000 | 624 x 288 | |
aM13 field 2 | Globular cluster | 6000 | 624 x 288 | |
M56 | Globular cluster | 3000 | 624 x 288 | |
M15 field 1 | Globular cluster | 2000 | 624 x 288 | |
M15 field 2 | Globular cluster | 4000 | 624 x 288 | |
HD 203991 | Binary star | 12000 | 128 x 128 | |
61 Cygni | Binary star | 15000 | 624 x 128 and 624 x 64 | |
8 Lacertae | Binary star | 12000 | 128 x 128 |
aCCD electrical heating disconnected.
|
For all the observations except those of 61 Cygnii, the multiplication
register was clocked with a high voltage providing a substantial gain
in the signal level.
In order to investigate the size of the isoplanatic patch which
prevails at the times of the best exposures, observations of binary
stars with a range of separations were undertaken. As the dimensions
of the CCD65 detector corresponded to
on the sky,
two of these binaries did not fit within the CCD field of view. In
order to observe these targets, an optical arrangement was employed
whereby two fields on the sky were superimposed on the detector (as
discussed in Figure 5.1). The centres of the two fields
which could be superimposed were separated by approximately
,
allowing the
binary 8 Lacertae to be observed in a
pixel sub-array of the CCD. A long
pixel strip
across the CCD was used for observations of the
binary 61
Cygnii. All the observations were taken within two hours of each other
and at relatively small zenith angles, so as to minimise the changes
in seeing from one observation to the next.
A number of relatively crowded fields in globular clusters were
observed in order to determine the limiting magnitude of reference
star for exposure selection and image re-centring. Different stars in
the field of view were picked as the reference, in order to find the
faintest star for which high resolution images could be obtained. The
fields chosen had previously been surveyed by the Hubble Space
Telescope, and stellar magnitudes were available for some of the
stars. These fields were also useful for testing the astrometric
performance, as the relative positions of a large number of stars
could be compared between different runs.
Bob Tubbs
2003-11-14